"Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors."
Irwin Mitchell
Access all documents on Corruption
'Corruptly' means purposely doing an act which the law forbids as tending to corrupt.
Any improper and unauthorised gift, payment or other inducement that is given in connection with the recipient's office or duties will be likely to be caught. The Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 – 1916 have been repealed and replaced by the Bribery Act 2010.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Anti-bribery and corruption—monitoring and review—checklist Under the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010), it is an offence for commercial organisations to fail to prevent bribery. This offence occurs when a person, ‘F’, associated with such an organisation, ‘G’, bribes another person with the intention to obtain or retain business, or an advantage in the conduct of business, for G. For further information on failure to prevent bribery and the penalties for bribery, see Practice Note: Failure to prevent bribery—the offence. It is a defence to a charge of failure to prevent bribery that a commercial organisation had adequate procedures in place to prevent it. The Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) Guidance on The Bribery Act 2010 covers procedures that relevant commercial organisations can put into place to prevent persons associated with them from bribing. Principle 6 of the MoJ Guidance on The Bribery Act 2010, states ‘the commercial organisation monitors and reviews procedures designed to prevent bribery by persons associated with it and makes improvements where necessary’. This monitoring and review Checklist...
Comparison between the Scottish self-reporting regime and Deferred Prosecution Agreements used in the rest of the UK—checklist There are key differences between the self-reporting initiative operated by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Services (COPFS) in Scotland (Scottish self-reporting initiative) and the deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) regime now operating in the rest of the UK (DPA regime). Any business that uncovers corruption within the organisation should make sure it understands the differences between the two regimes before deciding which authority to approach. This Checklist aims to set out the main differences between the Scottish self-reporting initiative and the DPA regime operating in the rest of the UK. Introduction to the two regimes Scottish self-reporting initiative The Scottish self-reporting initiative was introduced on 1 July 2011 when the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010), a UK-wide statute, came into force. The Scottish initiative applies solely to offences under BA 2010 or analogous bribery offences which applied before BA 2010 came into force. Under the regime, a self-reporting business can seek...
Discover our 9 Checklists on Corruption
Businesses and their employees must be alert to indicators of corruption. The following checklist identifies indicators of corruption which would normally give rise to an escalated investigation.•In the course of contract negotiations, or during the completion of a previous contract, consider whether there are any unusual payment mechanisms. These may include:◦attempted changes to agreed terms, such as requests for payments to be made urgently and/or ahead of schedule◦a request for cash payment◦payments being made through a third party country or to a shell company in another country◦an abnormally high commission being paid to a particular agency◦requests for payments to be split into two accounts for the same agent, particularly where the two accounts are in different countries◦the payment of high-value expenses (such as expensive restaurant bills), or non-business expenses (such as school fees) on behalf of others•Have there been private meetings with public contractors or companies/public bodies hoping to tender for contracts?•Has the business partner/agent been reluctant to have representatives of your company present at such meetings?•Have lavish gifts or...
The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) was passed to ensure the UK’s compliance with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and came into force on 1 July 2011. It was designed to provide an effective legal framework to tackle corruption in both the public and private sectors, modernising the UK’s anti-corruption legislation and replacing the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889–1916. For detailed guidance on historic anti-corruption law, see Practice Notes: Corruption and common law bribery—pre-Bribery Act 2010 [Archived], Pre BA 2010 bribery and corruption—Practicalities [Archived] and Pre-Bribery Act 2010 corruption—sentence tracker [Archived].BA 2010 has major implications for any business that is incorporated or trades in the UK. It applies to bribery committed by it, or on its behalf, anywhere in the world.Offences under the Bribery Act 2010BA 2010 criminalises four distinct types of conduct (offences):•bribing another person•soliciting or accepting a bribe•bribing a foreign public official, and•(for a business only) failing to prevent briberyCommon to each of...
Discover our 53 Practice Notes on Corruption
Consultancy agreement—company and individual—pro-client (short form) [ON HEADED NOTEPAPER OF CLIENT COMPANY] [Insert consultant’s name] [Insert consultant’s address] [Insert date] Dear [insert consultant’s name] [ Consultancy agreement OR Insert name of project ] Further to our recent discussions, I am pleased to confirm the terms of our agreement regarding the provision of your consultancy services to [insert name of client company] (Company). 1 Term 1.1 [Subject to the terms set out in this letter, your engagement [will commence OR commenced] on [insert date] and will continue unless or until either party gives to the other not less than [insert number] [weeks’ OR months’] prior notice in writing. OR 1.2 Your engagement will be for a fixed period of [insert number] months from [insert date], subject to the terms of this letter and subject to the right of either the Company or you to give to the other not less than [number] [weeks’ OR months’] notice in writing during such fixed period terminating the...
Internal communications briefing 1 Objectives Provide a summary of your key objectives here. For example: To comply with the requirements of the Bribery Act 2010, we need to ensure all our employees have carried out the online training on our anti-bribery and corruption policies and procedures. This needs to be completed by [insert date]. All employees need to understand that they must have completed the online training, including the self-assessment form, by this date. 2 Budget Provide details of any budget you can make available for the project here. For example: We have budgeted £[insert figure] for promotional materials. All training materials have already been commissioned and paid for. Please charge to cost code [insert]. 3 Audience details 3.1 Audiences involved Set out here details of all the people you need to communicate with. Depending on the size of your business and/or project, you may wish to arrange this by individual, by team or by division. Think about whether they will have any special message requirements,...
Dive into our 94 Precedents related to Corruption
What is an approved reporting mechanism (ARM)? What is an approved reporting mechanism? Assimilated Regulation (EU) 600/201 (UK MiFIR) requires investment firms that execute transactions in financial instruments to report details of those transactions to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as quickly as possible, and not later than the close of the following working day. Transaction reports can be made either by the investment firm itself, an approved reporting mechanism (ARM) acting on its behalf or by the trading venue on which the transaction was executed. An ARM is defined as a person authorised under the Data Reporting Services Regulations 2024, SI 2024/107 (DRS Regulations 2024) to provide the service of reporting details of transactions to the FCA on behalf of investment firms. ARMs, together with approved publication arrangements (APAs) and consolidated tape providers (CTPs), are referred to as data reporting services providers (DRSPs). For detailed information, see Practice Note: UK data reporting services providers — The UK DRSP regime. What operating requirements apply to ARMs? The operating requirements for...
Can a contracting authority change the procedure adopted for a public procurement exercise (eg from open to negotiated procedure) once the procurement process has started? In conducting our research we have focussed on above-threshold procurement exercises regulated by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015). As a general rule, contracting authorities conducting a public procurement exercise must adhere to the rules of the procedure that have been indicated/advertised in the Official Journal of the EU (OJEU) contract notice. Subject to the comments below, this means that it is not possible to negotiate with tenderers in, for example, an open or restricted procedure tender process. In particular, the Court of Justice made clear in SAG ELV Slovensko that: ‘the principle of equal treatment of tenderers and the obligation of transparency resulting therefrom preclude, in [the restricted] procedure, any negotiation between the contracting authority and one or other of the tenderers’. For background reading, see Practice Notes: The legal framework and general principles of EU public...
See the 4 Q&As about Corruption
This week's edition of Practice Compliance weekly highlights includes: the latest sanctions news, approval of AML guidance for the legal sector by HMT, new guidance on corporate self-reporting and DPAs by the SFO and an analysis on what legal teams need to know about AI standards.
This week's edition of IP weekly highlights includes: a hand-picked summary of news analysis, updates and new content from the world of IP. These highlights focus on the key rights of copyright and associated rights, database rights, trade marks and passing off, designs, and patents, as well as covering issues relating to confidential information, know-how R&D and IP disputes all mainly from a UK and European perspective.
Read the latest 25 News articles on Corruption
**Trials are provided to all UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these UUÂãÁÄÖ±²¥ services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234